A
MAZE
IN
ZAZAZA ENTER ZAZAZA
ZAZAZAZAZAZAZAAZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
ZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
THE
MAGIKALALPHABET
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262625242322212019181716151413121110987654321
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
25 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
THE KEY TO THE
MAGIKALALPHABET
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ME |
|
|
|
|
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
1+0 |
1+1 |
1+2 |
1+3 |
1+4 |
1+5 |
1+6 |
1+7 |
1+8 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ME |
|
|
|
|
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
N |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
I |
1+9 |
2+0 |
2+1 |
2+2 |
2+3 |
2+4 |
2+5 |
2+6 |
N |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
E |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
S |
THE
UPSIDE DOWN
OF
THE
DOWNSIDE
UP
AS ABOVE SO BELOW
ADD TO REDUCE REDUCE TO DEDUCE
H |
I |
N |
O |
S |
X |
Z |
Z |
X |
S |
O |
N |
I |
H |
8 |
9 |
14 |
15 |
19 |
24 |
26 |
26 |
24 |
19 |
15 |
14 |
9 |
8 |
|
|
1+4 |
1+5 |
1+9 |
2+4 |
2+6 |
2+6 |
2+4 |
1+9 |
1+5 |
1+4 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
9 |
8 |
H |
I |
N |
O |
S |
X |
Z |
Z |
X |
S |
O |
N |
I |
H |
8 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
9 |
8 |
H |
I |
N |
O |
S |
X |
Z |
Z |
X |
S |
O |
N |
I |
H |
ADVENT 145
E-mail to Dinah Lartey 29 August
2004 09:09
Dear Dinah In the search for the Sigma
Code, I suppose it was inevitable there would
be nine e-mails rather than the eight previously sent.
I found this today and thought that it also would
be of interest to Mr Balmond.
I will now disappear back under the
waters.
Ra-in bow good wishes to you and
Cecil Balmond
David
STARSEEKERS
THE AGE OF
ABSTRACTION
Colin Wilson
1980
Chapter Three
Page 63 6+3 = 9
"There is a simple
trick involving numbers that can be guaran-teed to
produce astonishment at any party. You ask someone
to write down his telephone number, then to write
it a second time with the figures jumbled up. Next,
tell him to subtract the smaller from the larger number,
and keep on adding up the figures in the answer until
he has reduced it to one figure. (5019 becomes
10, which in turn becomes 1 plus 0
- that is, 1.) When he has finished, you may
tell him authoritatively: 'The answer is nine.'
You can afford to be
dogmatic; for the answer is always nine.
It works with any set of figures, no matter how small
or how large. Jumble up the figures, subtract one
from the other, and the answer always reduces to 9.
I have no idea why this
is so, and have never come across a mathematician
who could explain it. It is just one of those peculiar
properties of numbers."
"You ask someone
to write down his telephone number, then to write
it a second time with the figures jumbled up. Next,
tell him to subtract the smaller from the larger number,
and keep on adding up the figures in the answer until
he has reduced it to one figure. (5019 becomes
10, which in turn becomes 1 plus 0
- that is, 1.) When he has finished, you may
tell him authoritatively: 'The answer is nine.'
You can afford to
be dogmatic; for the answer is always nine.
It works with any set of figures, no matter how small
or how large. Jumble up the figures, subtract one
from the other, and the answer always reduces to 9."
E-mail from Maurice
Cotterell dated 12 January 2004
Dave
Many thanks for your e-mail of the 28th. Forgive me
for not getting back earlier I have been very busy.
Your 99 piece was interesting, especially the
telephone number enigma which I solved over Christmas
and which now follows. I tried to send it earlier but
the format keeps getting lost. Given that you've sent
another e-mail I thought I'd better reply to the first.
I won't open your latest because it has an attachment.
herewith the answer to the telephone enigma:
The Telephone Number Enigma
There is an old curious enigma concerning the magical
properties of the number 9 which no-one appears
to be able to explain (as far as I know), at least not
until now.
The enigma is this;
Write down any telephone number. Jumble up the order
of the digits. Subtract the smaller number from the
larger number. Add together the digits in the answer,
and the result will always equal 9.
For
example, take the telephone number |
12345 |
Jumble-up
the digits; |
|
|
54321 |
|
|
Subtract the smaller
number from the larger number, |
|
|
|
|
54321 |
|
|
|
12345 |
|
|
Answer |
41976 |
Result: |
4
+ 1 + 9 + 7 + 6 = 27, 2 + 7 = 9 |
The answer to any enigma can be found more easily
by studying the exception, rather than the rule. In
order to solve the enigma we must first look for an
exception (if any exists).
Example: |
|
|
|
Take the number |
77777 |
apply
the rules |
|
|
77777 |
|
|
Answer |
00000 |
=
Result |
= 0 |
At first, this example appears to be an exception, the
result amounts to 0 and not 9. However, the example
is not a true exception to the .sum to 9ê
algorithm because it breaks both of the rules
of the game À it can be argued that the digits have
not been jumbled up and, moreover, that the smaller
number has not been subtracted from the larger [because
both numbers are of the same hierarchical value, neither
is smaller or larger than the other].
This exercise informs us that for the game to prove
true, in all cases, the rules of the game .must be strictly
adhered toê. Which, in turn, means that the rules are
essential factors in the determining the .sum to
9ê outcome. This may seem obvious, but it need not be.
GAME RULE 1: The rules of the game must be adhered to.
The Mechanics of the Base-10 numbering system
The number 9 is one of 10 numbers
we use in our base-10 numbering system. Our base-10
system orders the accumulation of numbers into columns
from left to right, where the column furthest to the
right represents the digits that lie from 0-9.
Greater accumulations of numbers call for the introduction
of another, new, column to the left of the 0-9 column.
When this happens, for example when the digits rise
in the units column to the limit of 9, a new
.tensê column needs to be created to the left. The tens
column now indicates 1 and the units column 0
resulting in a the .decimalê number of 10.
Again, when the number of tens exceed 9 another
new column needs to be introduced to cope with the larger
number and the new column is called the .hundredsê column
[for example 100 = 1 in the hundreds column,
none in the tens column and none in the digits column].
The opposite applies to reducing numbers that arise
due to subtraction. In this case columns reduce in number
from the left.
Decimal (Base-10) Rule 1: Greater accumulations
of numbers call for the introduction of another, new,
column to the left of the 0-9 column and reducing
numbers result in the loss of columns from the left.
Hence; because there are only nine numbers (and a zero)
no number greater than 9 can subsist without
the introduction of a new column to the left to accommodate
the larger number and no number less than 100
can subsist without the removal of one column from the
left.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Unique properties of the number
9
Multiples of the number 9 will always compound
to 9;
2 x 9 |
= |
18 |
1+8 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
3 x 9 |
= |
27 |
2+7 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
4 x 9 |
= |
36 |
3+6 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
5 x 9 |
= |
45 |
4+5 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
1 x 9 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 x 9 |
= |
54 |
5+4 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
7 x 9 |
= |
63 |
6+3 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
8 x 9 |
= |
72 |
7+2 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
9 x 9 |
= |
81 |
8+1 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
10 x 9 |
= |
90 |
9+0 |
= |
9 |
|
|
|
11 x 9 |
= |
99 |
9+9 |
= |
18 |
1+8 |
= |
9 |
12 x 9 |
= |
108 |
1+0+8 |
= |
9 |
etc |
|
|
This results because of the use of base 10 as
a numbering system;
10-1 = 9 and, considering twice the
number:
20-2 = 18, which must equal 9 + 9
In each case, any quantity of the number 9 must
always compound to 9
more examples;
30-3 = 27, which must equal 9 + 9 + 9 = 27,
2+7 = 9
Consider an example of a .telephone number 10000;
Example: |
Telephone number |
10000 |
|
|
Jumble digits |
00001 |
and subtract smaller from larger |
|
Answer |
9999 |
compound number must sum to
9 |
|
|
|
|
Example: |
Telephone number |
10000 |
|
|
Jumble digits |
00010 |
explicitly recognising base
10 decimal system |
|
Answer |
9990 |
compound number must sum to
9 |
|
|
|
|
Example: |
Telephone number |
10000 |
|
|
Jumble digits |
00100 |
explicitly recognising base
10 decimal system |
|
Answer |
9900 |
compound number must sum to
9 |
|
|
|
|
Example: |
Telephone number |
10000 |
|
|
Jumble digits |
01000 |
explicitly recognising base
10 decimal system |
|
Answer |
9000 |
compound number must sum to
9 |
Decimal (Base-ten) Rule 2: Any quantity of the number
9 must always compound to 9.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have seen how the rule works for the number 1000.
In fact, it works in the same way for any number greater
than 10, using the decimal system. [Numbers less
than 10 cannot be considered because an individual
number cannot be jumbled prior to subtraction. It is
also worth noting that numbers must be jumbled to enable
one number to finish up larger or smaller than the other,
which would, in turn, enable conformance with the rule
of subtracting the smaller from the larger. The jumble-rule
is hence, strictly speaking, not a rule in itself but
will be considered as such for the purposes of explanation
and analysis].
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The effect of .subtracting the smaller number from the
resulting larger numberê:
Using a simple example of a .telephone numberê
of 10;
Telephone number |
10 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
01 |
subtract smaller from larger |
Answer |
09 |
|
Telephone number 11 - digits cannot be jumbled,
hence the number 11 cannot conform with the rules
of the game [as was the case with the earlier ostensible
exception of 77777].
Telephone number |
12 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
21 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
09 |
|
Here, it becomes apparent that by subtracting
the smaller number from the larger number that the base
10 system produces a predictable outcome; this
is because the larger number [which in this example
(21)] contains two 10s and one 1. The
smaller number contains the corollary, one 10
and two 1s. Each time the telephone number increases
by 1 its corollary increases by a factor of 10
units.
GAME RULE 2: Digits of the original number must be jumbled.
The effect of the base-10 system when subtracting
a smaller number from a larger number
Examples; |
|
|
Telephone number |
13 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
31 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
i.e. |
31 |
|
|
-13 |
|
|
18 |
1+8 = 9 |
When the units column increases by 1 its corollary increases
by 10. Because of the rule requiring the smaller number
to be subtracted from the larger the net increase
in numbers must always be 10-1 = 9.
Decimal (Base-10) Rule 4: Each time the telephone
number increases by 1 its corollary increases by a factor
of 10. Hence, subtraction of the smaller number from
the larger number results in a product with a difference
of 10-1 = 9.
More examples; |
|
|
Telephone number |
14 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
41 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
27 |
2+7 =
9 |
Telephone number |
15 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
51 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
36 |
3+6 =
9 |
Telephone number |
16 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
61 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
45 |
4+5 =
9 |
Telephone number |
17 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
71 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
54 |
5+4 =
9 |
Telephone number |
18 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
81 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
63 |
6+3 =
9 |
Telephone number |
19 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
91 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
72 |
7+2 =
9 |
Telephone number |
20 |
|
Jumble digits (corollary) |
02 |
subtract smaller from larger |
|
|
|
Answer |
18 |
1+8 =
9 |
And so on.
But why does this work for large .telephone-sizeê numbers?
Taking again the example of 10000 used earlier;
Increase by 1
Subtracting smaller from larger
Increase by 1 again;
Subtracting smaller form larger;
Bringing the rules of the game together;
GAME RULE 1: The rules of the game must be adhered to.
GAME RULE 2: Digits of the original number must be jumbled.
GAME RULE 3: Subtracting the smaller number from the
larger number within the base-10 system produces a predictable
outcome.
together with the mechanics of the Base-10 system;
Decimal (Base-10) Rule 1: Greater accumulations of numbers
call for the introduction of another, new, column to
the left of the 0-9 column and reducing numbers result
in the loss of columns from the left. Hence; because
there are only nine numbers (and a zero) no number greater
than 9 can subsist without the introduction of a new
column to the left to accommodate the larger number
and no number less than 100 can subsist without the
removal of one column from the left.
Decimal Base-ten) Rule 2: Any quantity of the number
9 must always compound to 9.
Decimal (Base-10 rule) 3: Subtracting the smaller number
from the larger number within the base-10 system produces
a predictable outcome.
Decimal (Base-10) Rule 4: Each time the telephone number
increases by 1 its corollary increases by a factor of
10. Hence, subtraction of the smaller number from the
larger number results in a product with a difference
of 10-1 = 9.
Conclusion:
It can be seen that increasing any integer (larger than
10) by 1, jumbling the digits and subtracting the smaller
number from the larger number must result in a net difference
of 9 between the two sets of numbers. Hence, because
each telephone number is removed by at least 1 unit
from its neighbour the outcome of the exercise must
apply equally to all telephone numbers. Hence the outcome
of the algorithm must always compound to 9. The result
is determined by the rules of the game and the mechanics
of the base-10 system.
Best wishes = Maurice
HURRAH FOR RA FOR RA HURRAH